When AI Policies Fail: The AI Sanctions in Johnson v. Dunn and What They Mean for the Profession

Start
Imagine this: You’re representing a state in high-stakes prison litigation. Since 2020, your firm has received more than $40 million from the client. You have written AI policies, an Artificial Intelligence Committee, and a team of seasoned litigators. Still, two years after Mata v. Avianca made national headlines, firm partners are sanctioned for filing motions in federal court with citations fabricated by ChatGPT….
By: EDRM – Electronic Discovery Reference Model
Previous Story

Federal Court Vacates Key Provisions of HIPAA Privacy Rule on Reproductive Healthcare

Next Story

Data Loss Prevention in the Age of AI: Deploying Microsoft Purview DLP