Waiving the Past to Inflate the Future: When Plaintiffs Take Corenbaum Too Far

Start
California authority has long recognized medical costs may impact the assessment of general damages. In Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit District, the California Supreme Court observed: “[T]he cost of medical care often provides both attorneys and juries in tort cases with an important measure for assessing the plaintiff’s general damages.”……
By: Tyson & Mendes LLP
Previous Story

Key Takeaways from Mayer Brown’s Defense and Security Forum

Next Story

Victorian Supreme Court Confirms Separate Medical Panel Referrals in Baressi v Cross Yarra Partnerships