Supreme Court Reinforces EPA’s Primary Role in Pesticide Labeling in Monsanto v. Durnell

Start
On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Monsanto Co. v. Durnell that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) expressly preempts certain state-law failure-to-warn claims. Specifically, such a claim is preempted if its premise is that a pesticide label was deficient because it did not include a health-related warning that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had determined was not required based on the EPA’s assessment of the data related to the product….
By: Wiley Rein LLP
Previous Story

Congressmen Introduce REAL Butter Act

Next Story

Mind the gap: The Irish Court of Appeal identifies apparent legislative lacuna when applying to dismiss fraudulent personal injuries claims