Plaintiff’s Expert Precluded under Rule 702, Talc Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment Granted

4th Circuit US District Court – Plaintiff Patricia McElroy claimed asbestos exposure via talc-based beauty products from varying brands and asserted a cause of action based upon negligence and product liability, including inadequate design, formulation, breach of implied warranty, willful and wanton conduct, and failure to warn. The plaintiff alleged that defendant Colgate-Palmolive Company developed, manufactured, marketed, and distributed Cashmere Bouquet, which the plaintiff claimed caused…
By: Goldberg Segalla
Previous Story

Q3 2023: Food and CPG Legal Trends Report

Next Story

POTUS Issues Expansive Executive Order on AI, Calling for All Hands On Deck