Pennsylvania Trial Court Holds Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint in Motor Vehicle Injury Case Met Specificity Requirements Under Pa. R.C.P. 1028(a)(3)

Start
Brooks v. Shandor, 2025 WL 2093659 (Pa.Com.Pl.Civil Div.) – The plaintiff alleged in their amended complaint that they suffered “other injuries, the extent of which is not yet known.” The defendant raised a specificity objection pursuant to Pa. R.C.P 1028(a)(3). Upon reviewing the record, the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure and citing substantive state case law, the Washington County Court of Common Pleas noted that in order to determine whether an allegation in a pleading contains the…
By: Marshall Dennehey
Previous Story

Mental health warning signs at work: Can employers still rely on workers’ comp exclusivity?

Next Story

California Injuries Due to Negligent Security: Who is Liable?