New Jersey Supreme Court Affirms Bar on Future Medical Expenses Collectible Under PIP

Start
Murray v. Punina, 264 N.J. 1, 355 A.3d 242 (2026). The case originated from a personal injury trial in the Superior Court regarding a car accident. The Appellate Division reversed the trial court’s decision in part, finding that evidence of future medical expenses was inadmissible. The Supreme Court of New Jersey granted certification and affirmed the Appellate Division’s judgment. Murray v. Punina, 264 N.J. 1, 355 A.3d 242 (2026)….
By: Marshall Dennehey
Previous Story

Labor Law § 241(6) Claim Fails as Court Finds Excavator‑Safety Provision Not Sufficiently Specific

Next Story

Labor Law § 241(6) Claim Fails as Court Finds Excavator‑Safety Provision Not Sufficiently Specific