Interpreting the Printed Matter Doctrine in Inter Partes Review

In Ioengine, LLC v. Ingenico Inc. No. 2021-1227, 2021-1331, 2021-1332 (Fed. Cir. May 03, 2024), the case addresses the patentability/validity of three patents. In particular, this case discusses the application of the printed matter doctrine during inter partes review, the treatment of newly introduced claim constructions on appeal, and the PTAB’s anticipation and obviousness determinations….
By: Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Previous Story

Do legal AI tools that use RAG still hallucinate?

Next Story

Suspicious Minds: Protecting Tennessee Artists from Generative AI