Most lawyers regard Mata v. Avianca, Inc., 678 F. Supp. 3d 443, 448 (S.D.N.Y. 2023), as the leading case on the consequences of misuse of generative artificial intelligence in legal pleadings. It was from Mata v. Avianca that the legal community first became widely aware of the distinct possibility that publicly available generative AI tools like ChatGPT can yield “hallucinations” — i.e., completely fabricated legal authority — that unsuspecting legal researchers might insert into their court…
By: Esquire Deposition Solutions, LLC
By: Esquire Deposition Solutions, LLC
