Even Jepson Preambles Require Written Description Support

Start
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found a Jepson claim unpatentable where the specification did not provide adequate written description for the portion of the claim purporting to recite what was already well known in the prior art. In re Xencor, Inc., Case No. 24-1870 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 13, 2025) (Hughes, Stark, Schroeder, JJ.)…
By: McDermott Will & Emery
Previous Story

How to Explain Automated Decisions: Recent CJEU Decision and CPPA Rulemaking Offer Insight into ADM Explainability

Next Story

Security Best Practices for Remote Depositions in the Digital Age