Double Take: Fifth Circuit’s Dual BELO Rulings Show Both General and Specific Causation Are Essential

Start
We previously blogged about a decision in the In re Deepwater Horizon BELO litigation – Ruffin v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. – in which the Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for defendants in an alleged chemical exposure case based solely on exclusion of the plaintiff’s expert testimony on general causation without reaching the experts’ specific causation opinions. As it turns out, in another BELO case argued before the same panel on the same day, the panel analyzed the…
By: Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Previous Story

$27M Verdict Warns Employers: Vet and Train Employees or Pay the Price

Next Story

Were You or a Loved One Exposed to Asbestos? Get Your Free Asbestos Health Exam and Find Out If You Qualify For Compensation