CVC Files Response and Reply Brief in Interference No. 106,115 Appeal

In its appeal from an adverse decision on priority by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in Interference No. 106,115 (directed to CRISPR-mediated gene editing), Junior Party the University of California/Berkeley, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively, “CVC”) filed on May 19th its Response and Reply Brief to earlier briefing by Senior party Broad Institute, Harvard University, and MIT (collectively, “Broad”)….
By: McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
Previous Story

Mom’s Meals’ Parent Company Announces Data Breach Affecting Over 1.2 Million Consumers

Next Story

Court Upholds Tornado Cash Sanctions; New Crypto Products Launch; IRS Proposes Digital Asset Regulations; Crypto Enforcement and Hacks Continue