Is Your PFAS Coverage At Risk? An Ohio Federal Court Ruling Opens The Door To Broader Insurer Denials

Start
An insurance company denied coverage to a manufacturer of firefighting equipment for PFAS-related personal injury claims. The Northern District of Ohio held that coverage was barred by the occupational disease exclusion in the manufacturer’s commercial general liability (“CGL”) policy, even though the firefighter plaintiffs were not employees….
By: Benesch
Previous Story

Suing a Transit Agency Is Not Suing a Driver: The Government Claims Act, Common-Carrier Duty, and the Six-Month Clock

Next Story

Is Your PFAS Coverage At Risk? An Ohio Federal Court Ruling Opens The Door To Broader Insurer Denials