Court Grants Summary Judgment, Finding Trivial Tile Height and Lack of Causation in Slip-and-Fall Case

Start
Klobusnik v. The Carafaro Co. and Cafaro-Peachcreek Joint Venture Partnership, No. 1132-2021, 2025 WL 978886 (Pa. Com. Pl. Jan. 3, 2025) – In support of their motion for summary judgment, the defendant argued that the photographic evidence offered by the plaintiff, to show the height variation between floor tile heights in the area where she fell, was too trivial of a height difference to be deemed a dangerous condition. The defendant also argued that there was no evidence that it had actual or…
By: Marshall Dennehey
Previous Story

California Finalizes New CCPA Rules on ADMT, Cybersecurity Audits, and Risk Assessments

Next Story

California Pedestrian Rights vs. Driver Responsibilities: Understanding the Law